After a mountain of evidence of fluoride's dangers was presented to them by me and other delegates, 9 out of 11 Regina City Councillors steamrolled forward with the plan to force artificial water fluoridation on unwilling residents while wasting $2.5 million on fluoride infrastructure.
They voted down all motions put forth by Landon
Mohl, the lone councillor who voted against the original motion. Mohl put forth motions to stop the infrastructure funding, to wait a year until an impact
study could be done, and to have a referendum on the issue. These were all voted down by 9 out of 11 of the other city councillors:
Sandra Masters, Cheryl Stadnichuk, Bob Hawkins (the originator of the initial motion), Andrew Stevens, Lori Bresciani, John Findura, Daniel LeBlanc, Terina Nelson, and Jason Mancinelli
Any reasonable person would have halted the push for forced artificial water fluoridation after hearing the information that was presented by me, by other delegates, and by the many Regina residents who expressed their opposition to water fluoridation over the past year and a half.
Unfortunately, it's rare that we have wise or reasonable people in positions of institutional power these days!
The fight against forced water fluoridation is a historic battle, building on the work of anti-fluoride activists and educators from the past 70+ years. Regina has never before had artificial water fluoridation. The initial
vote to add fluoride to the water was snuck by in August 2021 at the
height of the Covid pandemic when people were too distracted and
exhausted (not to mention socially distanced) to put up a full
opposition.
Reginans have voted No on fluoride four times in the past,
establishing a historical majority of people against artificial water
fluoridation. Despite this, City Council steamrolled forward with plans
to fluoridate the water against the people's will.
Hydrofluorosilicic acid (HFSA) is a known toxin, neurotoxin, and carcinogen. It has been deemed "hazardous waste" by the Supreme Court of Canada. It is illegal to put hazardous waste in the water supply at any level. It is also illegal to administer a drug or health treatment through the water without informed consent, without being a physician or other applicable health professional, and without being able to regulate the dose of the drug being added.
These are criminal actions being committed against the people by Regina city councillors.
Local media has also been silent on the known dangers of water fluoridation and on the widespread local opposition to fluoridation this whole time. They are complicit in these crimes, as well.
We will continue fighting.
Hundreds of Studies Showing Health Harm from Fluoride Exposure
2 comments:
The City of Regina is preaching to people about having a "Green Christmas" all while forcing a known toxin, neurotoxin, and carcinogen, fluoride, into the water here against the will of the residents.
Irony, you're knocking it out of the park, as per usual!
https://twitter.com/WillowsWebAstro/status/1605240398087077888
U.S. federal court has now deemed fluoridation an "unreasonable risk" to the health of children, and the EPA will be forced to regulate it as such.
History has been made. After 7 years of pursuing legal action against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over the risk posed to the developing brain by the practice of water fluoridation, the United States District Court of the Northern District of California has just ruled on behalf of the Fluoride Action Network and the plaintiffs in our precedent-setting court case. A U.S. federal court has now deemed fluoridation an "unreasonable risk" to the health of children, and the EPA will be forced to regulate it as such. The decision is written very strongly in our favor.
Below is an excerpt from the introduction of the ruling:
"The issue before this Court is whether the Plaintiffs have established by a preponderance of the evidence that the fluoridation of drinking water at levels typical in the United States poses an unreasonable risk of injury to health of the public within the meaning of Amended TSCA. For the reasons set forth below, the Court so finds. Specifically, the Court finds that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligrams per liter ("mg/L") - the level presently considered "optimal" in the United States - poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children..the Court finds there is an unreasonable risk of such injury, a risk sufficient to require the EPA to engage with a regulatory response...One thing the EPA cannot do, however, in the face of this Court's finding, is to ignore that risk."
Please stay tuned as we will provide further comprehensive details on the ruling.”
Post a Comment