Showing posts with label pluto in aquarius. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pluto in aquarius. Show all posts

Monday, January 15, 2024

A Re-Post: Faux Aquarian Corporate Do-Gooding and Mastering the Plutonic Sociological Imagination as Pluto Transitions from Capricorn to Aquarius

This is a re-post of an article I originally wrote and published in December 2020. All the things raised in the article remain highly relevant today, as Pluto prepares to re-enter Aquarius on January 20, 2024. Pluto will move back and forth in latest Capricorn and earliest Aquarius in 2024, indicating a transitional year when the power establishment shifts gears with its schemes and scams, with its narratives and corpo-governmental "branding." 

Things are being rapidly and intensively "re-branded" for the Pluto in Aquarius years (2023 to 2044) and being prepared for this shift allows us to side-step the manipulations and protect ourselves and others from harm as much as possible. 

The raging corporatists from the Pluto in Capricorn years are re-branding themselves as (fake) humanitarian stewards for the Pluto in Aquarius years. But here's a spoiler alert: they're still selling the same toxic, authoritarian schemes.

Pluto will dip back onto the 29th degree of Capricorn from September 1 to November 19, 2024. Pluto re-enters Aquarius for good on November 19, 2024.

You can see the original article here: Faux Aquarian Corporate Do-Gooding and Mastering the Plutonic Sociological Imagination as Pluto Nears the End of its Transit of Capricorn 

As Jupiter and Saturn prepare to leave Capricorn (corporations, institutions, structure) for Aquarius (groups, global issues, social engineering), our intelligence is being terribly insulted with the announcement of a new group of self-appointed corporate global "Guardians," brought together by Pope Francis and the Vatican.

From December 9, 2020: Pope Francis Partners With Corporate Titans To Make Capitalism More Inclusive And Fair: Is This For Real Or Just Corporate Virtue Signaling? by Jack Kelly

This group, calling itself the Council for Inclusive Capitalism, claims it will come together to save the world through hiring more women and people of colour, switching to renewable energy, and promoting the recycling of water. 

This is common Aquarian Era schtick, and we must be aware of these transparent, faux do-gooding manipulations ahead of the Pluto in Aquarius years (2023 to 2044). Saturn transits Aquarius from 2020 to 2023, and there is a major attempt to establish and cement these types of "woke corporate" manipulations ahead of the Pluto transit. It's corporate re-branding for the Aquarian Era with strong themes involving global organization, (false) humanitarianism, "green" environmentalism, and the supposed elevation of humanity.

The list of self-appointed global corporate "Guardians" is absolutely farcical, including Rockefeller, Rothschild, Dupont, and British Petroleum, among other highly illustrious members, not to mention the Vatican itself.

The corporations and groups declaring themselves our trusted global "Guardians" are some of the worst criminals on Earth, including literal mass murderers. Let's be very clear on this - using renewable energy and hiring women and minorities does not miraculously make these criminals into good people when they've knowingly profited - and continue to profit - from the injury and murder of millions.

As Pluto transitions between Capricorn and Aquarius, the multi-billion dollar transnational corporations and institutions (Capricorn) that have created so much misery and toxicity on this planet will now attempt to morph into Humanitarian Global Governor Superheroes (Aquarius). They've profited massively from the problems they've created and will now attempt to cash in by selling us the supposed solutions - still steeped in the same control, coercion, and corruption at their Plutonic core. 

It is, in fact, the owners and executives of many of these corporations and institutions who should be under the watch of "Guardians" - prison guards in maximum security prisons. 

Just a quick glance at a few of these illustrious "Global Guardians":

The Rockefeller crew has roots in Big Oil; the Rothschild crew has roots in Big Banking. Both have ties to Big Pharma and the creation of a monopoly of patented, synthetic drugs in the field of medicine that has injured and killed literally billions of people on the planet. 

David Rockefeller was ex-Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, founded the Trilateral Commission, and participated in the Bilderberg group, all "shadow government" groups with enormous influence on the policies of the U.S. government (and beyond) with strong desires for global government, also referred to as the New World Order. This is no conspiracy theory. It's conspiracy fact. The billionaires involved are quite open about their plans. Multiple high-level politicians have spoken of the New World Order, including George Bush, Sr. on September 11, 1990 in a speech to U.S. Congress. "The Great Reset" is the next major push toward these ends. 

The Rothschild family hold dominance and control through centralized banking, owning the banking systems of no fewer than 164 countries, including the United States Federal Reserve and the Bank of England. The Rothschilds have been accused of funding and profiting from both sides of major wars. Both Goldman Sachs (instrumental in the derivatives-based housing collapse of 2008) and British Petroleum are in the Rothschild portfolio. 

British Petroleum's most recent claim to fame was the preventable Gulf of Mexico oil disaster in 2010 that killed 11 rig workers. Toolpush Jason Anderson was extremely worried about British Petroleum's lax safety practises at the time and voiced his concerns to his wife Shelly. Anderson was so worried, in fact, that the last time he was home, he got his affairs in order and wrote his will. He was one of the 11 men killed in the April 20, 2010 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig. The disaster released an estimated 130 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. It takes only one quart of motor oil to make 250,000 gallons of ocean water toxic to wildlife. This oil was then dispersed - not cleaned up - by spraying millions of gallons of the toxic chemical dispersant Corexit into the ocean. In a fit of corporate criminal hilarity, Corexit was actually banned in Britain at the time that British Petroleum was dousing the Gulf of Mexico with it. Ill health and wildlife deaths in the Gulf area have been widely reported, continuing to this day, and commercial fishing was devastated, destroying the livelihoods and way of life of many Gulf residents. Health problems related to the oil gusher and use of Corexit have included severe respiratory problems, migraines, terrible skin rashes and growths, cancer, chronic headaches and nosebleeds, and general ill health. A local mother Kindra Arnesen moved her family out of the area after her husband, a commercial fisherman, and her child became ill following the rig explosion. This video shows tar balls, as well as frothy foam with a chemical odour washing up on Long Beach, Mississippi in October 2010. I reported on this issue extensively in 2010 and 2011. A documentary called The Cost of Silence was released this year, covering the ongoing health catastrophe and the cover-up and lack of action by governments. (It was the Obama Administration that allowed the Corexit catastrophe to occur.)

Dupont has a long history of profiting from death via the military industrial complex, first profiting from the manufacture of gunpowder for the U.S. military during World War I and then producing Plutonium at Hanford, Washington for the Manhattan Project and creation of the atomic bomb during World War II. Hanford, Washington has the distinction of being the most radioactively-contaminated site in the United States, and Dupont's handiwork there continues to shorten people's lives to this day. Dupont has gone on to merge with Dow, the major producer of Agent Orange for the U.S. military during the Vietnam War. Agent Orange has caused injury, birth defects, cancer, and early death for the Vietnamese people and for U.S. soldiers continuing to this day. Dow-Dupont also has a long and illustrious history producing toxic genetically modified organisms and the chemicals that go with them, which I've been writing about since 2010.

The Big Pharma components of this Farcical Faux Philanthropic Endeavour - Johnson&Johnson and Merck - are where I will focus most of this article. The crimes against humanity committed by these corporations are enough to make one's head spin. Some of this information has been detailed in a November 28, 2019 article, Jupiter in Capricorn and the Forced Vaccine Agenda

Johnson&Johnson: Toxic Talc, Deadly Levaquin and Prepulsid

Johnson&Johnson has killed thousands of people and long-term disabled tens of thousands (at the very least) with its deadly and debilitating fluoroquinolone antibiotic Levaquin, which was prescribed without warning for minor infections and even used as a preventative in hospitals for over 20 years. Levaquin was finally pulled from the market in 2017 (generic forms of levofloxacin are still widely prescribed), but the damage was already done and the J&J profits were already made. 

Levaquin causes the same type of damage as other fluoroquinolone antibiotics, including severe tendon and connective tissue damage, nerve damage/peripheral neuropathy, aortic dissection or aneurysm, muscle weakness and wasting, arthritis and joint pain, chronic fatigue, digestive disorders, blood sugar regulation problems, organ damage, vision damage, tinnitus, and chemical-induced psychiatric problems that can be long-lasting or even permanent. 

Oh, and death. We can't forget death.  

Independent researchers combed the United States Food and Drug Administration's data over the course of a 10-year period. (Let's remember that Levaquin was prescribed and used widely all around the world for over 20 years.) They found 80,000 adverse drug reactions possibly associated with Levaquin and generic levofloxacin, including 1,000 deaths. Since it is estimated that only between 1% and 10% of adverse drug reactions are reported to official channels - or are accepted as being linked to the drug - you can do the math on the real numbers.

Class action lawsuits are being prepared over Levaquin, as well as other fluoroquinolone antibiotics Cipro and Avelox, produced by Bayer. 

Johnson&Johnson's gastrointestinal drug Prepulsid officially killed more than 300 people and harmed many more, and it was basically no more than a pharmaceutical version of Tums, Rolaids, or Ex-Lax. Terence Young wrote a book on it called Death By Prescription: A Father Takes on His Daughter's Killer - the Multi-Billion Dollar Pharmaceutical Industry after his 15-year-old daughter Vanessa was killed by Prepulsid. A common story, Johnson&Johnson kept the drug on the market after it was aware of the problems, and there was no timely government intervention to warn people or protect their health.
Allowing the pharmaceuticals corporations to pretty well police themselves is a common practise by federal government agencies like Health Canada and the United States Food and Drug Administration.

Now, Johnson&Johnson ("The Baby Company!") is paying out $100 million to settle more than 1,000 lawsuits alleging its talc-based baby powder causes ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. There are more than 20,000 additional lawsuits alleging the same thing, and Johnson&Johnson has already been ordered by courts to pay hundreds of millions to its victims or victims' families in other suits. 

Johnson&Johnson stopped selling the talcum powder in the U.S. and Canada in May 2020 but continues to sell it internationally.

Johnson&Johnson's talcum-based powder was sold for over a century all the while being laced with asbestos. Because of this, the true number of related deaths is impossible to even estimate. Reports show that since 1971 and up to the early 2000s, Johnson&Johnson covered up tests showing this asbestos contamination. 

Johnson&Johnson's History and Connection to Asbestos by Daniel King

June 3, 2019: Johnson & Johnson Hit with $325M Verdict in Talc-Mesothelioma Case by Tim Povtak

"A state jury in New York ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $300 million in punitive damages to Donna Olson and her husband who claim its talcum powder caused her to develop mesothelioma.

The same jury awarded the couple $25 million in compensatory damages a few days earlier.

The total verdict is one of the highest in almost three years of litigation over Johnson & Johnson’s various talc products.

Plaintiffs believe the talc once contained asbestos fibers, which are known to cause mesothelioma and other cancers.

In 2018, a jury in St. Louis awarded $4.69 billion to 22 women and their families who claimed asbestos in the talc products caused their ovarian cancers."

May 24, 2018: J&J Loses Second Asbestos in Talcum Powder Lawsuit by Matt Mauney

"Johnson & Johnson suffered its second trial loss in two months Wednesday linking the company’s baby powder to deadly asbestos-related cancer.

A Los Angeles jury awarded $21.7 million in compensatory damages to Joanne Anderson, who said she developed mesothelioma after being exposed to asbestos in J&J baby powder laced with the carcinogen.

J&J was ordered to pay an additional $4 million in punitive damages Thursday, bringing the total award for Anderson to $25.7 million."

April 11, 2018: Talcum Powder Lawsuit: J&J, Imerys to Pay $80M in Punitive Damages  by Matt Mauney

"Johnson & Johnson and talc supplier Imerys SA must pay an additional $80 million in punitive damages to a man who said he developed mesothelioma after using asbestos-contaminated talcum powder, a New Jersey state court jury ruled Wednesday.

The court has awarded $117 million in total damages in the case. Last week, a New Brunswick, New Jersey, jury ordered J&J and Imerys to pay $37 million in compensatory damages to plaintiff Stephen Lanzo III and his wife."

Merck: Profits from the Deadly and Debilitating Gardasil Vaccine pay off Vioxx Lawsuits

Merck killed tens of thousands of people and injured tens of thousands more with its arthritis drug Vioxx, leaving it on the market for five years from 1999 to 2004, all while the corporation profited hugely from the death and destruction caused by the drug. In 2007, Merck paid $4.85 billion to around 47,000 litigants who said they or their loved ones suffered injurious or fatal heart attacks or strokes after using Vioxx.

We always have to keep in mind that the cases that make it to court represent only a portion of the true victims. These are the cases that had the strongest possibility of being proven in a court of law, that could be most conclusively linked to the drug, and that had litigants with the financial and emotional resources to deal with lawyers and court proceedings. The true number of victims in all cases will be much higher than the "official numbers."

Merck Agrees to $4.85 Billion Settlement in Vioxx Claims  

In 2011, Merck was also ordered to pay $950 million for deceptive marketing of Vioxx.

Merck Pays $950 Million Settlement for Deceptive Marketing

"Merck & Co., the second-largest pharmaceutical company in America, agreed to pay $950 million in a settlement with federal prosecutors. The settlement resulted from their “misbranding” of Vioxx, a painkiller which was pulled from the market in 2004 after a study found that it increased heart-attack and stroke cases. The year before it was pulled, Vioxx generated $2.5 billion in sales, making it Merck’s third-most popular drug at that time. Merck already paid $4.85 billion to settle thousands of patient lawsuits claiming injuries, $1.9 billion in legal costs, and $58 million to settle state claims that the company’s TV advertisements were deceptive and covered up health risks. This defective product caused extensive harm for injury victims who suffered personal injuries as a result of Merck’s negligence.

The central controversy in this case was marketing: prosecutors contended that Merck marketed Vioxx for unapproved uses – between 1999 and 2002 it sold Vioxx as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis when it was not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for that purpose – and for false statements about its cardiovascular safety."

Now, Merck has moved on to pushing its deadly and debilitating (also largely unnecessary) HPV vaccine, Gardasil. This vaccine has already killed thousands of people worldwide (at least), mostly teenagers, and long-term debilitated hundreds of thousands. 

Merck has attempted to make Gardasil a blanket vaccine for all school-aged children as a cash cow to pay off the Vioxx lawsuits. Merck's own internal documents have proven this. Because vaccine manufacturers cannot be sued in the United States (the main Gardasil cash cow country), all future Gardasil damages will be paid out by the U.S. taxpayer through government vaccine courts, not by Merck or any of the other vaccine manufacturers.

VAXXED TV on YouTube is a rich resource of interviews with people and families that have been negatively impacted by the effects of vaccines. A search for "VAXXED TV Gardasil" provides dozens of stories of horrifying Gardasil-related injuries and deaths. Here are just a few: 

Gabby Larkin, a 16-year-old Australian girl who developed cancer and died after receiving the Gardasil vaccine.

Colton Berrett, a Utah teen paralyzed from the neck down by the Gardasil vaccine. He subsequently ended his own life.

Christina Tarsell, a 21-year-old who was killed by the Gardasil vaccine. This was even the ruling of the U.S. Federal Vaccine Court: Gardasil killed Christina. 

Maddie was damaged by the Gardasil vaccine and subsequently ended her own life in 2017. 

Brittany, a California teenager, was vaccinated with Gardasil by her mother, a nurse. Brittany developed leukemia soon after and died 10 months after diagnosis.

Meredith Prohaska, a 12-year-old Wisconsin girl died after receiving the Gardasil vaccine.

Ashlyn Brill, a Wisconsin teenager, has suffered more than 300 seizures since having the Gardasil vaccine. 

Sydney Weggen, an Iowa girl experienced devastating health damage following the Gardasil vaccine. 

More links to stories have been collected at Health Impact News (scroll to the bottom of the page).

 



A 2017 documentary called Sacrificial Virgins - the Dangers of the HPV Vaccination can also be viewed on YouTube.

Following testimony in 2014 from women who had been injured by the HPV vaccine, the Japanese government revoked its recommendation that women be vaccinated with it. The government has since set up clinics specifically to treat the damage that has been done by the HPV vaccine.

The thing to remember about statistics is that they are not just numbers. Every digit represents a precious and loved person on this planet who was injured or killed and whose loved ones were left devastated, often for a lifetime, by the wickedly criminal activities of pharmaceuticals corporations and complicit government agencies.

As a person who was poisoned, nearly killed, and long-term debilitated by the fluoroquinolone antibiotic Cipro, I know this devastation firsthand.

From February 3, 2018: Stop Bayer-Monsanto's Crimes Against Humanity, Animals, and the Environment!

From April 13, 2017: Pluto in Capricorn and the Plutonic Sociological Imagination

All Cipro-related articles since 2009

I also, through this experience, have developed the full Plutonic sociological imagination - a beautiful gift produced from a long and painful trip through pharmaceutical-induced Hell. 

My trip into this Hell world was initiated in 2009, in the earliest years of the Pluto in Capricorn transit. Pluto first entered Capricorn on January 25, 2008 for a 16-year transit in the sign of institutions, corporations, and finance. Pluto is now in the last decan of the sign of Capricorn, and we're coming through the final years of the transit before Pluto enters Aquarius in 2023.

The particular flavour of the Plutonic sociological imagination produced by this transit is now maturing and concentrating. We're coming into the full, mature understanding of the ways in which we are being harmed, poisoned, and killed (Pluto) for the profit of corporations and institutions (Capricorn). 

The sociological imagination is the ability to place our personal experiences into their broader sociological context. It's the way collective or societal dynamics trickle down into the life of an individual. Almost never are we experiencing something alone, as an isolated individual within an isolated event. Most often, there are many other people experiencing what we are experiencing, caught up in the same manufactured trends, dynamics, systems, and structures.  

The Plutonic sociological imagination is the ability to place our personal experiences of Hell on Earth into their broader collective or sociological context. Almost never do we experience Hell on Earth as isolated individuals within isolated events, either. The Plutonic sociological imagination shows us that our personal Hell is most often connected to the same manufactured sociological conditions that affect many others on the planet. This manufactured Hell is a shared Hell. 

Our personal Hell has been created for us in many cases, manufactured by the very people who ultimately profit from it. It is a collective, sociological construct that grabs its victims one-by-one and isolates them so the full picture will be obscured.

Our own personal Hell is often just the tip of the Plutonic iceberg, with thousands, millions, or even billions of other people experiencing very similar things for very similar reasons.

Being poisoned and damaged by Ciprofloxacin has brought me into a huge web of people around the world who know just what I know - or are in the process of learning it. We're the victims or the survivors of the unscrupulous pharmaceuticals/vaccine corporations and the complicit governments who allow them to run amok unregulated, and we number in the billions. 

We've fallen prey to the same slick, multi-million dollar advertising campaigns, to the same wining and dining of physicians by pharmaceuticals reps, to the same buried safety tests, to the same ignored adverse reaction reports, to the same discounted stories from those harmed as meaningless "anecdotal evidence," to the same communications breakdowns, to the same weak or non-existent regulations, to the same government agencies closing their eyes and giving it all a green light.

Pluto’s machinations in our personal lives - taking us under until we cannot deny what it has to show us - bring us into the Plutonic sociological imagination. Our personal stories have roots that connect us to many other human beings experiencing similar things, becoming caught in the same traps, falling prey to the same dirty tricks.

In the case of Pluto, the Hell we experience at a personal level is often inextricably linked with the Plutonic requirement for collective awareness, transformation, and change. In other words, the experiences of the individual being brought to light creates increased awareness in the collective or group. 

It is by connecting our personal stories of Plutonic Hell to the broader, collective experiences that we can move out of hellish isolation and struggle. It is by bringing our own personal stories into their broader societal and sociological context that we can pinpoint the dynamics, join forces, and move out of Hell together.

Pluto is the Lord of the Underworld, the Master of Hades, and dragging us into experiences of Hell as we live our lives on Planet Earth is its general modus operandi. Pluto strips the maya, there’s no doubt about it. It removes the rose-colored glasses and unceremoniously crushes them under its heel. Once Pluto has you in its grips, you can be certain that you will never again be the same – but this is ultimately a good thing. At a soul level, it's a very good thing.

Pluto relates to a process of alchemical change, growth, and development that originates at the soul. As part of this, Pluto forces us to experience things we would never choose to experience on our own. I mean, who would willingly go to Hell? Who would willingly take on immensely painful Plutonic experiences and the associated emotional/psychological torment?

Pluto is aligned with the necessary experiences of the soul as it advances the collective scene through personal work and struggle.

And Pluto doesn’t care a whit about the desires of the ego or the personality!

Pluto's transformational process can be called many things: painful, brutal, hellish, cruel. It often forces us to points of emotional, psychological, and/or physical breakdown. But the Plutonic process must go on in order to facilitate the continued survival of the human soul.

We're here for a reason, for a limited amount of time, and Pluto won't do us the disservice of letting us forget it. It won’t allow us to waste our precious time as dupes, as less effective than we truly are or could be.

Pluto sets its sights on anything that has been avoided, glossed over, or swept under the rug. It
exposes things that have been hidden or suppressed, including dishonesty, coercion, lack of integrity, and dirty dealings, drawing this muck and mire up to the surface and into broader collective awareness. 

During the Pluto in Capricorn years, this Plutonic process has particularly been applied to banks, corporations, governments, and institutions. Since 2008, transiting Pluto in Capricorn has been bringing to the surface underlying power dynamics related to authority and hierarchy. These power dynamics are often rooted in the power of money and hidden, coercive influence rather than in any real, inherent form of leadership or authority.

Almost across the board, the people at the highest echelons of the hierarchical pyramid schemes of power on this planet are not our leaders. They are not our authorities. They do not hold legitimate influence over us. They are, in fact, injuring, poisoning, and killing us.

So as these absolute fools, these criminals, these murderers, attempt to appoint themselves our global corporate "Guardians," just laugh and politely say, "No, thank you. We see through you."

This is just the beginning of the Aquarian re-branding scheme we'll see over the next years as corrupt individuals hiding behind corporations and governmental institutions during Pluto in Capricorn change facades into Humanitarian Global Guardians for the Pluto in Aquarius years. Be forewarned. 

Most multi-billion dollar pharmaceuticals corporations have similar criminal rap sheets, and the same type of Plutonic excavation could be done on any of the self-appointed "Guardians" in that list. It only takes the lightest of digging to discover these threads. For more on Bayer-Monsanto and Purdue Pharma: Stop Bayer-Monsanto's Crimes Against Humanity, Animals, and the Environment!

 

 

Five star reviews at Etsy for "Nightmarish Tales of the Pharmaceutical Industry's Crimes Against Humanity Volume One"

"This zine is super important and I cannot wait to share it with my healthsciences students."

"
Very insightful!! You had me looking at every medicine I had in our cabinet. Shared it with my family and they were astonished. Nice work!"

 

 

Friday, January 12, 2024

Humanity’s Accelerated Spiritual Maturation Process with Saturn and Neptune in Pisces as Pluto Shifts Signs

 

 Venus conjunct Mars (also conjunct Pluto) at 6 degrees Aquarius - 

February 22, 2024

Click chart to enlarge.

 

"Humanity’s Accelerated Spiritual Maturation Process with Saturn and Neptune in Pisces as Pluto Shifts Signs" is an article available to Willow's Web Astrology patrons



Thursday, June 15, 2023

New Zine: Cell Tower and 5G Wireless Dangers

 

This 40-page pocket-sized zine is chock full of information, studies, news articles, and stories about cell tower and 5G dangers.  

 

Cell Tower and 5G Wireless Dangers Zine at Etsy

 

VIDEO: How to Make a Zine - Cell Tower and 5G Dangers

 

Bitchute Link

 


Did you know that many peer-reviewed studies going back 20+ years show an increased incidence of cancer, cognitive problems, radiation illness, and other ailments when people live within 500 metres of a cell tower? The deadly 5G wireless rollout densely packs cell towers, base stations, and repeaters all throughout our cities and towns. This makes it difficult or even impossible for people to avoid dangerous involuntary wireless exposures.

It's important to understand that these cell tower distance studies were conducted on 2G, 3G, and 4G towers. 5G radiation is much more intense than previous technologies, and 5G technology exposes us to many more pulsed frequencies than we have ever been exposed to before. It is harmful to all biological life - human, animal, and plant.

5G wireless is the technological infrastructure that supports "Smart Cities," "Smart Farms," widespread surveillance, artificial intelligence, and the automation and elimination of hundreds of millions of jobs worldwide. 

I'm happy to instruct people on how to produce this zine for themselves, if anyone is interested in this DIY publishing effort.

5G Kills! Ban 5G Worldwide.

 


Long arm staplers ftw! 

 

Wednesday, May 24, 2023

My Delegations Against Cell Tower Densification and the 5G Wireless Rollout - May 24, 2023 and August 17, 2022

The Pluto in Aquarius work is hot and heavy already! I'm posting this work as documentation of the ongoing and historical opposition to cell tower densification and the 5G wireless rollout. This fight is going on worldwide with millions of people involved. This information is meant to assist people in resistance to these toxic schemes in their own areas.

We just witnessed a crime against Reginans and against biological life last night at the Regina City Council meeting, and these same crimes are being committed, lock-step, by City Councils all across Canada and all across the planet.

On May 24, 2023, following multiple delegations and many peer-reviewed studies proving the folly and criminality of their actions, Regina City Council rubber-stamped a gutless cell tower protocol that calls for a cell tower setback of 1.5 times the height of the tower. This would amount to somewhere between 50 and 150 metres. This approved setback is laughable and entirely inadequate for safety. We know from many studies that there is an increased incidence of cancer, neurobehavioral problems, radiation sickness, and other ill effects when people live within 500 METRES of a tower.

SaskTel, the provincial government, City Hall, and local media are all working in concert to promote this pointless and useless cell tower protocol, and here's the real loophole: since 5G small cell antennae are tiny and are affixed to lightposts and the sides of buildings, this setback does not apply to any of that toxic 5G infrastructure.

These are the members of Regina City Council who approved the inadequate setback: Sandra Masters, Bob Hawkins, Cheryl Stadnichuk, Andrew Stevens, Lori Bresciani, John Findura, Daniel LeBlanc, Terina Nelson, Shanon Zachidniak, Jason Mancinelli, and Landon Mohl.

The mayor and councilors, involved members of the City Clerk's office, SaskTel employees, Minister Don Morgan, and members of the provincial government are all complicit. This is a declaration that we know who is harming us, and we demand an immediate end to these crimes.

This is my five-minute delegation speech on the dangers of cell towers and 5G wireless, presented at the Regina City Council meeting on the cell tower protocol on May 24, 2023:
"I’m one of the many electromagnetically sensitive residents of Regina who is being harmed by current cell tower installations in the city. I’ve experienced serious ill effects after coming into inadvertent contact with multiple cell towers in Regina.
Already, cell tower radiation levels in Regina are near-intolerable for EMF sensitive people, and plans to expand the dangerous and highly-secretive 5G wireless rollout would add hundreds of new radiation-emitting antennae, base stations, and cell towers to the city.
Residents of Regina should be aware that Regina City Council is providing its concurrence on cell tower locations in the city with zero consideration for health and safety. Incredibly, the City of Regina claims that related health and safety concerns are “out of its jurisdiction.” This is not leadership, and it is, in fact, morally criminal.
The federal safety standards being touted – Safety Code 6 – were written decades ago and do not protect from non-thermal (ie. wireless) radiation.
Thousands of cities and municipalities worldwide have worked to halt the 5G rollout in their areas, citing health and safety concerns, among many other problems including surveillance. Regina City Council could take many steps to halt the installation of new cell towers and 5G infrastructure in the city, but it has chosen to take none of these steps.
In fact, in 2019, the City of Regina vied for federal government grant money for bringing Smart City infrastructure to Regina in what was called a “Smart Cities Challenge.” Residents should be aware that the City of Regina has shown support for making Regina a Smart City. The creation of 5G-driven Smart Cities is tied to the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 and its so-called “Sustainable Development Goals.” Let’s just say, there is nothing “clean, green, or sustainable” about these agendas.
Regina City Council has already heard from multiple electromagnetically-sensitive delegates at the August 17, 2022 City Council meeting on the cell tower protocol.
Of the nine delegations at that meeting, eight were opposed to the new proposed cell towers. Only one delegation was in favour, and that delegation was employees of SaskTel - the corporation financially benefitting from cell tower densification and the 5G wireless rollout.
Local media coverage of cell tower dangers has been abysmal, almost entirely ignoring and downplaying the known human health concerns, including from electromagnetically sensitive residents of Regina.
From previous population survey studies, a conservative estimate is that 5% of the world’s population experiences ill effects from wireless radiation exposures. In some of these people, the debilitation is severe, to the point of disability. In a city of 200,000 people like Regina, this means at least 10,000 residents experience some ill effects from wireless radiation and cell towers. If a survey were done in the areas surrounding the currently-existing towers in Regina, you would see many of the symptoms of electro-sensitivity being reported, which can include:
- intolerance to cell towers and wireless devices
- headaches
- extreme fatigue
- cognitive and memory problems
- dizziness
- insomnia and sleep disturbances
- tinnitus
- vision changes
- tingling or burning sensations in the skin, body, hands or feet
- heart palpitations
- feelings of pressure in the chest or head
- trouble breathing
- nausea or lack of appetite
- mood changes and neuro-psychiatric effects like depression, anxiety, anger, irritability, or symptoms of schizophrenia
- muscle twitching
- hair loss
Electromagnetic sensitivity is a condition on the rise worldwide, and we are simply the canaries in the coal mine. The wireless radiation that harms us immediately will harm others over a longer timeline. We’ve known for decades that people experience ill health when living and working around cell towers, but this knowledge is being ignored by Regina City Council, by SaskTel, by local media, and by all levels of government.
I and others have submitted over 100 studies showing health harm and biological effects from wireless radiation, including at levels lower than the government and telecommunications industry claim are safe.
The City’s cell tower protocol is suggesting a cell tower setback of around 50 metres. This is laughable and in no way adequate for safety. A 2004 study showed that people were three times more likely to get cancer if they lived within 400 metres of a cell tower, and that study was done on 2G and 3G towers, which produce much less powerful radiation than 5G towers. There are already thousands of Reginans living and working closer than 400 metres to a cell tower, and this gutless cell tower protocol allows City Council to continue rubber-stamping new cell towers and the 5G rollout as it strives to make Regina a Smart City.
Continued cell tower and antennae densification in Regina would create an urban environment toxic to biological life – human, animal, and plant. It would create a city where it is impossible to avoid dangerous, involuntary wireless radiation exposures simply by walking down a city street. It would force a mass migration of electromagnetically-sensitive residents and homeowners out of the city. Stop the tremendously dangerous 5G wireless rollout in Regina. Place a moratorium on all new cell towers, antennae, and base stations. Apply a retroactive setback of at least 500 metres for current cell towers, base stations, and antennae."
 
 

 


This is my five-minute delegation speech on cell tower and 5G wireless dangers, presented at the Regina City Council meeting on the cell tower protocol on August 17, 2022:

"I’m here today to speak against the plan for more cell towers to be erected in residential and business areas of Regina.

I’m an electromagnetically sensitive person and will, without a doubt, be harmed by additional cell towers in the city. Already, I can barely tolerate the levels of radiation in Regina, and I’m far from the only resident experiencing this.

I experience many debilitating symptoms from wireless devices and cell towers, including fatigue, headaches, dizziness, tingling in my hands and feet, heart palpitations, heaviness in my chest, insomnia, and pain.

I would suggest that a survey of people living around the already-existing cell towers in Regina would show similar symptoms.

Electromagnetic sensitivity is a condition that is on the rise worldwide, and we are simply the canaries in the coal mine. The electromagnetic radiation that harms us immediately will harm others over a longer timeline. We’ve known for decades now that people experience ill health when living and working around cell towers, but this knowledge is being ignored in the rush to roll out 5G (fifth generation) wireless technology worldwide.

There are more than 10,000 scientific studies and a mountain of anecdotal evidence showing health harm and biological effects from even low doses of non-ionizing radiation – doses lower than government and industry claim are safe. These adverse effects are seen in humans, animals, insects, and plants.

Some of the health damage documented in these studies includes altered heart rhythms; neurological and neuro-psychiatric problems like headaches, depression, fatigue, insomnia, dizziness, difficulty concentrating, and memory dysfunction; DNA damage; cell death; increased oxidative stress; increased incidence of cancer; disrupted calcium levels; and lowered fertility. A 2004 study titled ‘The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone Transmission Mast on the Incidence of Cancer’ showed that people were three times more likely to get cancer if they lived within 400 metres of a cell tower. There are already thousands of Reginans living and working closer than 400 metres to a cell tower. Because 5G technology requires many more cell towers in closer proximity to people's homes and businesses, almost everyone on Earth would be living within 400 metres of a cell tower if the planned 5G rollout is allowed to continue. In 2004, the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) passed a resolution opposing the installation of cell towers on fire stations in the U.S. and Canada. This followed increasing complaints from fire fighters about adverse health effects. A 2004 brain study of California fire fighters exposed to cell tower radiation over the previous five years showed brain abnormalities, cognitive impairment, delayed reaction time, and lack of impulse control.

So why are cell towers now being placed near schools, daycares, libraries, churches, businesses, and residences?

The health effects experienced by the fire fighters in the early 2000s were occurring with 2G cell towers. 5G radiation is many times more intense than previous generations, exposing people to potentially hundreds of new pulsed frequencies in an intensity to which we have never before been exposed – up to 30 GHz with microwaves, and up to 300 GHz with millimetre waves. Councilor Bob Hawkins has been quoted in local media stating that the aesthetic ugliness of cell towers could be the only possible objection from the public. This is very far from the truth. Millions of people all over the world oppose 5G and are fighting to have cell towers removed or blocked from their neighbourhoods.

Tens of thousands of scientists and doctors worldwide have signed petitions calling for the halt of untested 5G technology, citing health and safety concerns.

The proposal to erect a cell tower, quite possibly 5G equipped, very near two elementary schools in Harbour Landing is particularly disturbing.

In 2019, after immense public pressure, parents of students at Weston Elementary School in Ripon, California finally won the right to remove a cell tower on the campus of that school only after tremendous health damage was done. From 2016 to 2019, four students and three teachers at the school were diagnosed with different forms of cancer. I do not wish to see a repeat of this scenario in Regina. Millions of people around the world oppose the rollout of dangerous 5G technology for other reasons, as well, which include the creation of 5G and 6G-driven “Smart Cities,” the Internet of Things; electronic monitoring, tracking, tracing, and surveillance, including facial recognition cameras; automation leading to the mass loss of jobs; and the use of artificial intelligence, including in police and military. 5G technology is untested for health and safety, especially for long term exposures. There are zero scientific studies showing that 5G radiation is safe, and this especially goes for millimetre waves. The Federal Government's safety standards, Safety Code 6, are terribly outdated and do not protect Canadians from non-ionizing radiation at all. Safety Code 6 was written decades ago, before wireless devices and cell towers were used widely in society, and covers only thermal radiation. In light of the known dangers, the new cell towers, including 5G-equipped towers, being proposed for Regina must be stopped, and continued densification of cell towers in the city must halt. Unsafe towers that are currently installed in Regina must be moved outside areas where people live, work, and go to school. Thank you."
 
 

 
 
 
 

Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer

by A. Balmori, 2022

Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935122011781

"Abstract

The objective of this work was to perform a complete review of the existing scientific literature to update the knowledge on the effects of base station antennas on humans. Studies performed in real urban conditions, with mobile phone base stations situated close to apartments, were selected. Overall results of this review show three types of effects by base station antennas on the health of people: radiofrequency sickness (RS), cancer (C) and changes in biochemical parameters (CBP). Considering all the studies reviewed globally (n = 38), 73.6% (28/38) showed effects: 73.9% (17/23) for radiofrequency sickness, 76.9% (10/13) for cancer and 75.0% (6/8) for changes in biochemical parameters. Furthermore, studies that did not meet the strict conditions to be included in this review provided important supplementary evidence. The existence of similar effects from studies by different sources (but with RF of similar characteristics), such as radar, radio and television antennas, wireless smart meters and laboratory studies, reinforce the conclusions of this review. Of special importance are the studies performed on animals or trees near base station antennas that cannot be aware of their proximity and to which psychosomatic effects can never be attributed.

Introduction

During the last few decades, hundreds of thousands of mobile phone base stations and other types of wireless communications antennas have been installed around the world, in cities and in nature, including protected natural areas, in addition to pre-existing antennas (television, radio broadcasting, radar, etc.). Only the aesthetic aspects or urban regulations have been generally considered in this deployment, while the biological, environmental and health impacts of the associated non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation emissions have not been assessed so far. Therefore, the effects on humans living around these anthropogenic electromagnetic field sources (antennas) have not been considered.

Conclusion

In the current circumstances, it seems that the scientific experts in the field are very clear about the serious problems we are facing and have expressed this through important appeals (Blank et al., 2015; Hardell and Nyberg, 2020). However, the media, the responsible organizations (World Health Organization, 2015) and the governments are not transmitting this crucial information to the population, who remain uninformed. For these reasons, the current situation will probably end in a crisis."

Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone Base Stations

by Amparo Alonso-betanzos and Lennart Hardell, 2010, International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health


Link: https://www.academia.edu/16767697/Epidemiological_Evidence_for_a_Health_Risk_from_Mobile_Phone_Base_Stations

“Human populations are increasingly exposed to microwave/radiofrequency (RF) emissions from wireless communication technology, including mobile phones and their base stations. By searching PubMed, we identified a total of 10 epidemiological studies that assessed for putative health effects of mobile phone base stations. Seven of these studies explored the association between base station proximity and neurobehavioral effects and three investigated cancer. We found that eight of the 10 studies reported increased prevalence of adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer in populations living at distances < 500 meters from base stations. None of the studies reported exposure above accepted international guidelines, suggesting that current guidelines may be inadequate in protecting the health of human populations. We believe that comprehensive epidemiological studies of longterm mobile phone base station exposure are urgently required to more definitively understand its health impact.”

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G

Published in the journal, Environmental Health, 2022


Link: https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9

“In this paper, we show how the past 25 years of extensive research on RFR demonstrates that the assumptions underlying the FCC’s and ICNIRP’s exposure limits are invalid and continue to present a public health harm. Adverse effects observed at exposures below the assumed threshold SAR include non-thermal induction of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, sperm damage, and neurological effects, including electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Also, multiple human studies have found statistically significant associations between RFR exposure and increased brain and thyroid cancer risk. Yet, in 2020, and in light of the body of evidence reviewed in this article, the FCC and ICNIRP reaffirmed the same limits that were established in the 1990s. Consequently, these exposure limits, which are based on false suppositions, do not adequately protect workers, children, hypersensitive individuals, and the general population from short-term or long-term RFR exposures. Thus, urgently needed are health protective exposure limits for humans and the environment. These limits must be based on scientific evidence rather than on erroneous assumptions, especially given the increasing worldwide exposures of people and the environment to RFR, including novel forms of radiation from 5G telecommunications for which there are no adequate health effects studies.”

The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone Transmission Mast on the Incidence of Cancer

by Horst Eger, Klaus Uwe Hagen, Birgitt Lucas, and Peter Vogel


Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241473738_The_Influence_of_Being_Physically_Near_to_a_Cell_Phone_Transmission_Mast_on_the_Incidence_of_Cancer

PDF file - http://www.tetrawatch.net/papers/naila.pdf

“The result of the study shows that the proportion of newly developing cancer cases was significantly higher among those patients who had lived during the past ten years at a distance of up to 400 metres from the cellular transmitter site, which has been in operation since 1993, compared to those patients living further away, and that the patients fell ill on average 8 years earlier. In the years 1999-2004, ie after five years' operation of the transmitting installation, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebled for the residents of the area in the proximity of the installation compared to the inhabitants of Naila outside the area.”