As I was sitting at the bus stop (more Gemini) with my groceries, an elderly woman walked up to
the bus bench with her own bags. I asked if she minded me sitting beside her (unmasked).
She didn't. She asked if I minded if she kept her mask off. I didn't.
She said she had been vaccinated and asked if I was going to get it. I
said no.
She asked me how it was to go into stores without a mask, whether I had to show documentation of my medical exemption. I told her people don't have to show documentation to prove a medical exemption but that I had some just in case. I said some stores accept the exemptions and others do not (this is actually discrimination). Her son doesn't wear a mask and hasn't been going anywhere because of the mask mandate. (How terrible.) I told her that if he has severe anxiety from wearing a mask, he has a legitimate medical exemption. She said he was not aware of that and that wearing a mask would definitely cause severe anxiety for him. She said she'd pass that information on to him.
After I dropped my groceries off at home, I went to the second hand bookstore. I asked if I could shop with my medical exemption, and the owner said I could. When I was paying for my books, she asked me if I was going to get the shot. I said no. She said she didn't want to get it either but that she'd been getting a lot of flak from her loved ones because of it. Her doctor also told her she should really get it "because she's aboriginal." (???)
She said she didn't realize there were a lot of people who weren't getting the shot. I said there were a lot of us and that only a little over 50% of Americans had gotten it so far. She said she thinks it's a personal choice.
Since the "official" narrative is strictly pro-shot, I believe we're getting a skewed representation of the real perspectives among the public on these subjects. We have politicians and celebrities singing the praises of the shot, absolutely saturating mass media with pro-shot perspective (I would say propaganda). We have businesses saying they will not hire unvaccinated people and that the shot will be mandatory for workers. We have hundreds of U.S. universities saying the shot will be mandatory for all students and they will not accept any unvaccinated students. We have hospitals attempting to force all employees to get the shot. The idea of a "vaccine passport" is being floated with the understanding that the unvaccinated would not be allowed to travel internationally. We have "incentives" for getting the shot - everything from free doughnuts to free joints to free shots of alcohol to a chance to win a million dollars in a lottery. Children over the age of 12 have been deemed competent to get the shot without parental permission and without parental accompaniment. Pop-up vaccine clinics are offering free ice cream to kids who get the shot.
A smattering:
Students protest mandatory Covid vaccinations at colleges
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons pleads with universities: do NOT mandate COVID vaccine
117 employees sue Houston Methodist hospital for requiring COVID-19 vaccine
Delta first major U.S. airline to require new hires be vaccinated
United Airlines says it, too, won't hire unvaccinated workers
Letter from
Saskatchewan (Canada) Parents to School Boards, Superintendents, and Principals:
"We demand you halt all injections throughout the schools in this
province immediately."
This is all extremely sad because a potent cocktail of peer pressure, professional intimidation, fear, and intense media
propaganda can make people do things they wouldn't ordinarily do. It can make people go against their own intuition and their own consciences.
True consent requires informed consent, and I don't believe we are seeing the full picture presented by those chosen to represent the cause on mainstream media.
The United States Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has recorded 294,801 adverse reaction reports related to the shots in the first five months of the rollout. This includes:
- 5,165 deaths
- 5,317 life threatening
- 3,994 disabled
- 13,574 severe allergic reactions
- 1,342 anaphylaxis
In general, official statistics represent between 1% and 13% of all adverse reactions. There is quite possibly heightened vigilance and reporting in this case, but the official numbers will still only represent a fraction of the real injuries and deaths.
As of June 19, 2021, the combined totals of deaths and injuries following the Covid shots in the European Union, United Kingdom, and United States were: 21,192 deaths and 2,698,177 injuries.
This experimental gene therapy has, of course, been rolled out around the world, which means the total worldwide numbers of deaths and injuries will be dramatically higher.
This means that in the past five months, tens of thousands of souls (at the very least) have left this planet unnaturally and unwillingly, and millions more are now living the hell that is vaccine injury - either because they themselves were injured or because a loved one was injured.
The perspective being furthered through the current establishment scientific and medical paradigm is that this number of injuries and deaths was expected, that it's reasonable, and that the people injured and killed are, in effect, unfortunate collateral damage to get a fully vaccinated public.
I believe this is a sociopathic way of looking at things.
The point isn't how rare the reactions supposedly are in comparison to the number of shots given worldwide. (There is also zero knowledge about any long-term effects.) The point is that these shots have killed, disabled, or injured millions of people worldwide in the past five months in what is basically a clinical trial for an experimental gene therapy that has no proven track record for efficacy and no long-term safety record.
Turning real people, real devastated people and families, into "numbers and data" that can be written off as "unfortunate but expected collateral damage" is horrifically wrong-headed in my opinion, but this is the usual way of looking at injuries and deaths related to vaccines.
If a person is informed of the true risks versus benefits, freely chooses to get the shot, and is injured or killed, at least that was the person's own choice.
If a person has been coerced, intimidated, pressured, or frightened into getting the shot and that person is injured or killed, that's a double tragedy.
The numbers of dead and injured are unprecedented as far as VAERS data within a five-month time frame. There have been more adverse reaction reports in the past five months than were recorded in a 15-year period previously, and the numbers are climbing.
There are many, many doctors speaking out about these unprecedented illnesses and deaths, but they aren't making it onto mainstream media platforms. If they do speak out or dare to practise medicine in a way that is contrary to the official orders, they are being censored and professionally censured.
One of those doctors is Dr. Charles Hoffe, who practises in a small, predominantly aboriginal town called Lytton in British Columbia, Canada. Dr. Hoffe spoke out about the high numbers of deaths and long-term injuries (seemingly permanent) he was seeing as he administered the shots. Dr. Hoffe said he was seeing a horrifically high severe adverse reaction rate of 1 in 225. He wrote a letter about it to Bonnie Henry, the British Columbia Provincial Health Officer and primary media mouthpiece for the current agenda.
Shortly afterward, he was told by the British Columbia Interior Health Authority that he could no longer work in the emergency room in his town.
It's ironic that the second hand bookstore owner was told by her doctor that she should really get the shot "because she is aboriginal" when there is evidence of severe adverse reaction or death at a rate of 1 in 225 for aboriginal people in Lytton, B.C.