Recent announcements by several major processed food corporations - including Kellogg's, General Mills, and Campbell's - that they will start labeling genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their products bring up some issues that are highly pertinent during the transit of Saturn through Sagittarius (December 2014 to December 2017).
What follows is an excerpt from an article I wrote on the transit, which appears in Issue #2 of Hexagon Astrology Magazine.
"During this Saturn transit, we will be working with a number of suppressed
(Saturn) truths (Sagittarius) within our cultures. This involves some of the
knowledge we absolutely must master in order to be successful from here on in...
The spread of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the continued
infiltration of the food supply are major "suppressed truth" subjects
on which we must get a strong handle during the transit of Saturn through
Sagittarius.
Damage to animal health has been shown in multiple scientific feeding trials
of GMO diets published since 2012. The Seralini study, the Carman study, the
Kruger study, the Italian study on GM soybeans and goats: all indicated animal
health damage from GM diets. Reproductive damage, digestive damage, liver and
kidney damage, tumors, DNA changes, immunity issues, low weights, and premature
death were just some of the problems observed.
If animals are exhibiting this GMO-related health damage, it is almost
certain that the humans eating the animals, animal products, and GM crops will eventually
experience similar problems.
Despite bans on genetically modified seeds and crops, genetically modified
canola has been found growing wild at four sites in Switzerland. (These represent
four “scientifically documented” cases, not the full extent of the problem.)
Conventional canola is now so contaminated by genetically modified versions
that GM canola plants are spreading wherever canola is transported or planted.
This means that even nation-wide or continent-wide bans cannot stop the spread
of genetically modified seeds and plants.
Here, we see the challenges of living in a world of global trade where
decisions made in one country can negatively affect other countries halfway
across the world (a Saturn in Sagittarius theme).
The labeling of foods containing GMOs, often touted as a solution, is also
not fully effective. The truly insidious problem is the unintentional and
undesired spread of GMOs into natural crops. Labels would cover only those
foods knowingly produced with GMOs. Unintentional contamination – a widespread
problem – would continue to fly under the radar.
These are examples where the anti-GMO rhetoric (“labeling will solve the
problem,” “banning GMOs from our country will solve the problem,”) is not the
full truth. The solutions being proposed and accepted at a mass level are not
fully effective.
We will be confronted with many instances during Saturn’s transit of
Sagittarius when the accepted rhetoric, including in alternative scenes, is not
fully effective or truthful. It will be up to us to call these out."
The largest processed food corporation in the world, Nestle, announced on April 20, 2016 that it is removing genetically modified ingredients from six of its top ice cream brands - Edy's, Haagen Daaz, Skinny Cow, Outshine, Nestle Ice Cream, and Nestle Drumstick.
"With a focus on simplifying ingredient lists while maintaining the same great tastes consumers have grown to love, the newest changes vary across more than 100 products, with examples including the removal of artificial colors and flavors, high fructose corn syrup and GMO ingredients,” the press release states.
This move by Nestle is being applauded by many.
However, this is a perfect example of the accepted rhetoric - and the corporate public relations spin machines - not being fully truthful about the situation.
Please allow me to call this one out...
Ice cream is made from milk (or "milk ingredients" if we are talking corporate ice cream, as we are in this case). Milk comes from dairy cattle. Dairy cattle, and most livestock across the board, are being fed genetically modified feed in the mainstream (non-organic) agricultural systems.
So Nestle can win big public praise and enjoy mucho corporate spin from its announcement that it is "removing GMO ingredients" from its products.
But what Nestle really means is that it is removing ingredients that are knowingly genetically modified, such as high fructose corn syrup, which is made directly from genetically modified corn.
Nestle knows the high fructose corn syrup it uses is genetically modified. This would be provable in a court of law should Nestle label its products free of GMO ingredients and continue to use this corn syrup.
However, the milk Nestle uses for its ice cream is also genetically modified - just in a more roundabout and less easily proven way. It may not be directly considered a genetically modified ingredient, but the milk Nestle uses in its ice cream products is almost certainly contaminated with genetically modified organisms - either through feeding the dairy cattle a known GM crop (corn) or through feeding the cattle a crop that has become unintentionally and unknowingly contaminated with GMOs (alfalfa).
The same is true for any conventionally produced animal product, including meat and eggs. Almost across the board, the conventional agricultural system feeds livestock genetically modified feed (corn, alfalfa, soy, etc.), and this practise contaminates the food.
From the Nestle U.S.A. website:
"Q. Do you consider ingredients derived from animals fed with GMO feed to be GMO ingredients?
We do not consider ingredients derived from animals fed with GMO feed to be GMO ingredients...
Q. Are GMO ingredients safe?
Foods made with GMO ingredients are as safe as foods made with ingredients from conventional crops."
Now, every time a corporation releases a statement about labeling GMOs or removing GM ingredients, it suddenly gets a big, shiny gold star from some of the less shrewd (though I'm sure well-meaning) members of the anti-GMO movement.
Nestle gets to look like a big hero by announcing its plans, even though these plans amount to little more than a half-assed gimmick that will not, in actuality, rid its products of GMOs.
There was a very interesting YouTube video making the rounds a few years ago of an old interview of then-Nestle CEO Peter Brabeck. Brabeck has since risen up the ranks and sits as Chairman of the Board of Nestle. The interview quite clearly exposed the eugenicist beliefs of this man and the eugenicist roots of this food corporation (and I use the term "food" very loosely here).
In the interview, Brabeck sings the praises of genetically modified foods, attempting to convince the public that they are perfectly safe to eat:
"But organic is not best. After 15 years of eating GM food products in the U.S.A., not one single case of illness has occurred from eating them to date."
Brabeck also shares his profound wisdom that water should not be free to the general population and that the idea that water is a basic human right is "extreme."
Yes, you read that correctly. Brabeck believes that the people of Earth should have to pay for the privilege of water to drink:
"There's that lovely old Austrian folk song, 'The dear cattle need water, hollera, holleri,' if you remember. Water is of course the most important raw material we have today in the world. It's a question of whether we should privatise the normal water supply for the population. And there are two different opinions on the matter. The one opinion which I think is extreme is represented by the NGOs, who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being, you should have a right to water. That's an extreme solution. And the other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other, and like any other foodstuff, it should have a market value. Personally, I believe it's better to give a foodstuff a value so that we're all aware that it has its price."
(Shall we also commodify the very air that we breathe for corporate profit? If people like Brabeck could, they would.)
Now, Brabeck doesn't believe in water as a basic human right, nor does he believe that water should be free for the populace.
He does, however, believe that water should be free to his corporation.
For many years, Nestle has extracted groundwater in bulk from multiple locations around the world for nothing or next-to-nothing, bottling it and then selling it back to the public at huge mark-ups.
In just one of those locations - Hope, British Columbia - Nestle was extracting hundreds of millions of litres of water per year without paying a cent. "Nestle Bottles Millions of Litres of Canadian Water - and Pays Nothing" by Dan Fumano
Amidst public pressure to crack down on this free corporate extraction of groundwater, the British Columbia provincial government now requires Nestle to pay.
Yes, Nestle extracts an estimated 319.5 million litres (71 million gallons) of water every single year from the Hope, B.C. area alone and is now required to pay the British Columbia government $265 per year to do so.
Two hundred and sixty five dollars per year.
Nestle then bottles that water and sells it back to us at $2 a pop for a 500 millilitre bottle.
Nestle even continued to extract water from a California native tribe's water basin as the state was crippled by the 500-year drought.
Kunkeltown, Pennsylvania is Nestle Corp.'s latest target for this morally criminal bulk water extraction. Residents of the town are fighting back after a 2014 zoning change left them open to Nestle pillaging their water supply.
The cattle need their (bottled) water, don't you know?
With the North Node of the Moon and Jupiter transiting Virgo (with Jupiter a major influencing placement as dispositor of Saturn in Sagittarius), there are fine distinctions that must be made, clarified, and hammered home as the corrupt Pluto in Capricorn-era corporate culture rolls out its grand pronouncements and shiny publicity stunts.
Truly eradicating the devastating contamination of our food supply by genetically modified organisms - grown without restriction for decades now - will take far more effort, far more diligence, and far more desire than these corporations are willing to put forth.
These are surface-level gimmicks designed to placate and fool the public.
To truly root out the evil of these nefarious corporations, we need to get out of the stream of corporate press releases and public relations spin.
And we need to eliminate processed foods from our diets altogether.
Instead of adding to corporate coffers, spend your money at Farmer's Markets or on locally-sourced foods in the supermarket that are produced ethically, without GMOs, excessive chemicals, or poisonous additives.
Bring the soul back into food - something of which mass-produced corporate food products are almost entirely devoid.
Buy organic or "up to organic standards" whenever you can.
If you have the means and the physical ability, grow your own garden. Or buy a share in a community-supported agriculture (CSA) initiative.
Break the habit of eating convenience foods that are not good for us. Break the addiction to processed foods and refined sugar altogether.
And call these corporations dicks out for their lies and half-truths every chance you get.
This is how we give the old "eff you" to corporations that do not give a damn about human health, safety, or wellness.
A new YouTube video I did on the subject: GMO Labeling is Not Fully Effective: Puncturing Corporate (and Activist) Spin on GMOs
All GM Alfalfa articles from Willow's Web Astrology, dating back to 2011: GM Alfalfa
1 comment:
If I hear the truly ridiculous argument that "since all seeds cross-pollinate in the wild, we're already eating GMO food all the time," one more time, I think I will simply implode.
There is a distinct difference between seeds cross-pollinating naturally in the wild and seeds being intentionally genetically engineered by human beings in a laboratory somewhere to withstand massive doses of chemical that would kill a natural (non-GMO) plant.
Multiple studies have linked both genetically modified diets and glyphosate (the main ingredient in Bayer-Monsanto's Roundup herbicide, the most popular herbicide in the world) with things like cancer, reproductive damage, organ damage, and digestive damage.
Bayer-Monsanto, BASF, and Dow-Dupont are chemical corporations that got into the seed/agriculture game so they could sell more of their chemicals. The motivation is pure corporate greed.
Glyphosate, the primary ingredient in Roundup, has been proven in multiple courts of law to cause non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It has also been linked to leukemia and b-cell lymphoma. We've seen hundreds of millions of dollars awarded through the courts to various plaintiffs.
(The awards were later lowered drastically by the judges.)
Dewayne Johnson, 48, was originally awarded $289 million for compensation for his terminal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This was later reduced to $20.4 million.
Edwin Hardeman, 71, was originally awarded $80 million for his Roundup-caused non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, which was later reduced to $25 million.
Alva and Alberta Pilliod, 78 and 75 respectively, were awarded $2 billion for their non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, later reduced to $86.7 million.
There were more than 125,000 lawsuits against Bayer-Monsanto over Roundup-related cancer and illness. They settled these cases for $10 billion in 2020: https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/24/health/bayer-monsanto-roundup-settlement/index.html
Roundup herbicide, first produced by Monsanto and now Bayer-Monsanto, is the most popular herbicide in the world, and the world is now awash with it after GMO crops have proliferated. These (criminal) chemical corporations genetically alter the seeds to withstand massive doses of herbicide that would kill any natural plant. So they deliver massive doses of chemical into the soil and into the food itself.
Corn, canola, and soybeans are almost entirely genetically modified at this point (aside from organics). Their derivatives are found in most processed foods, including in the form of lecithin, maltodextrin, and corn syrup. Sugar beets, alfalfa, cotton, papayas, apples, potatoes, salmon, and zucchini are some other foods that can be genetically modified. Eating organic or up to organic standards remains the best bet for avoiding GMOs.
Article on the Roundup cancer lawsuits: https://www.consumersafety.org/product-lawsuits/roundup/
Post a Comment